Know what will derail delivery before the release does.

See ownership, pending review, missing decisions, and operational risk from ticket through review and release, across the work your people and AI agents are moving.

Start Free See the risk read

Illustrative prepared output

Release-risk read

Two risks and one missing decision need a release posture.

Example workspace · updated 7 min ago

Prepared

Pending review

Needs owner

ENG-482 is marked In review and checks pass, but PR #1842 still has no approving owner.

GitHub · PR #1842Linear · ENG-482

Missing decision

Decision needed

The #beta-launch thread accepts narrower scope, but that release decision is not recorded on ENG-482.

Slack · #beta-launchLinear · ENG-482

Operational signal

Investigate

AUTH-219 has 18 new staging events in 15 minutes; production impact is not confirmed.

Sentry · AUTH-219GitHub · PR #1842

The operating problem

Release risk hides in the joins between tools.

A ticket looks on track while a review waits, an owner changed in chat, and an operational signal quietly changes the risk. Status reporting is late because managers must reconstruct a live system from partial updates.

Evidence for an engineering-manager risk read

LinearScope, owner, aging, and blocked delivery state

GitHubImplementation, checks, and pending review

SlackDecision trails, exceptions, and ownership changes

SentryOperational signals that can change release posture

Lit Factory connects operational tools through MCP. Available context and actions depend on the connections and permissions configured for your workspace.

One agentic workflow

Prepare a grounded release-risk read.

The read is prepared from connected work, review, decision, and operational context. It shows the evidence and missing decisions instead of inventing a confidence score.

Trigger01

A release window or operating review begins.

The manager asks for a risk read, or a scheduled review reaches its preparation window.

Grounded context02

Current delivery evidence is assembled.

Open work and owners, implementation and review activity, unresolved decisions, and operational signals are gathered with their sources.

Prepared action03

Risk and missing decisions are named.

The agent groups blocked work, pending reviews, unclear ownership, and evidence that could change the release decision.

Human decision04

The manager chooses the release posture.

Ship, narrow scope, reassign, request a decision, or hold. The selected action and rationale remain traceable.

After trust is established

Automate the repeatable follow-through.

After the team trusts the read, prepare it on a cadence, route reminders for missing owners or decisions, and update routine follow-through after the manager acts.

Human in Control

The decision stays human.

Lit Factory prepares the operating picture and proposed follow-through. The engineering manager decides what counts as acceptable risk, who owns the response, and whether delivery proceeds.

Intended outcome: fewer surprise blockers and a release decision grounded in current work, review, decision, and operational evidence.

Turn on the lights, then move with confidence.

Start Free